Following the economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, an industrial tool supplier had seen revenues drop by more than $200M. Across 10,000+ clients, the company had seen 10% of customers reduce their orders resulting in a loss of over US$200 million in annual revenue.
The company realized that churn reduction would be critical to reclaiming this lost revenue. If they could identify which customers were at risk of reducing their orders or leaving altogether, they could take preventive measures through targeted marketing campaigns or discount policies.
However, identifying “at-risk” clients manually was problematic. With over 10,000 customers, a high volume of accounts needed to be monitored at once. In addition, there were several different early indicators of churn derived from a host of data sources. Finally, it was necessary to spot these indicators in customers’ risk exemplifying behavior.
It became self-evident that manual processes would not suffice. The task seemed overwhelming until the company discovered that AI and machine learning could provide the answer.
The Problem With Churn Prediction in Industrial Supplies
Churn behavior is challenging to identify and prevent, particularly with physical rather than digital products. Early indicators with materials supply are derived only from ordering behavior, payment data, and feedback on support forums and customer service portals. These factors produce thousands of data points and are not straightforward to measure, compare and analyze.
Most customers “vote with their feet” and rarely leave feedback on why they no longer use a product or service. Even if it were possible to conduct exit interviews to determine why customers left, it is usually too late to win them back. The client knew that it was vital to develop methods to provide early warnings for churn-like behavior so that customers at risk of defecting were identified and addressed as soon as possible.
Many companies lack workable strategies for churn reduction because they use reactive, costly methods to address the problem. While proactive customer engagement accounts for more than a quarter (28%) of support interactions, only 28% of companies have proactive engagement efforts in place.